The Lena narrative highlights concerns about which concepts regarding copies of a mind?

The Lena narrative highlights concerns about which concepts regarding copies of a mind?

• A. Personhood and rights in relation to copies of a mind
• B. The technical feasibility of mind uploading
• C. The legality of cloud storage
• D. The cost of AI hardware

Answer: (C)

This question tests how the Lena narrative frames the issue of copies of a mind in terms of law and governance. The story uses the idea of storing a mind copy in cloud servers to probe questions about legality: who owns the copy, who can access it, what regulations apply across borders, how consent and privacy are protected, and what duties cloud providers have to retain, secure, or delete the data. Framing the scenario this way makes legal and regulatory questions the focal point, rather than purely technical capabilities, philosophical status, or cost concerns. That focus explains why legality of cloud storage is the best answer. It captures the central tension the narrative foregrounds: the rights, responsibilities, and constraints that govern how a mind copy exists in and interacts with cloud infrastructure. The other topics—whether mind uploading is technically possible, whether a copy has personhood or rights, or how expensive the hardware must be—are peripheral to the core ethical and policy questions the Lena tale is designed to illuminate.

This question tests how the Lena narrative frames the issue of copies of a mind in terms of law and governance. The story uses the idea of storing a mind copy in cloud servers to probe questions about legality: who owns the copy, who can access it, what regulations apply across borders, how consent and privacy are protected, and what duties cloud providers have to retain, secure, or delete the data. Framing the scenario this way makes legal and regulatory questions the focal point, rather than purely technical capabilities, philosophical status, or cost concerns.

That focus explains why legality of cloud storage is the best answer. It captures the central tension the narrative foregrounds: the rights, responsibilities, and constraints that govern how a mind copy exists in and interacts with cloud infrastructure. The other topics—whether mind uploading is technically possible, whether a copy has personhood or rights, or how expensive the hardware must be—are peripheral to the core ethical and policy questions the Lena tale is designed to illuminate.