What are the three questions asked about any alleged right according to Marmor?

What are the three questions asked about any alleged right according to Marmor?

• A. What is the origin, what is the scope, and who enforces it?
• B. What is the underlying interest, how can this interest be protected, and what counts as a violation?
• C. How is the right created, how is it limited, and what remedies exist?
• D. How does the right compare to other rights, what are its costs, and who pays?

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is that any alleged right is best understood through three questions: what underlying interest the right is meant to protect, how that interest should be safeguarded in practice, and what would count as a violation. This trio centers the right on a concrete motivational justification (the interest), specifies the means to shield it (protection), and sets clear boundaries for when the right has been violated. It keeps analysis focused on why the right matters, how it is enforced, and what actions would breach it, rather than just describing where it comes from or what remedies exist. In AI ethics terms, you’d identify the important interest at stake (such as privacy or autonomy), describe the appropriate protections (laws, governance, and technical safeguards), and define violations (like data misuse or coercive manipulation) to determine when the right is violated. Other formulations tend to emphasize origins, remedies, or comparisons, which can miss one of these essential components.

The main idea here is that any alleged right is best understood through three questions: what underlying interest the right is meant to protect, how that interest should be safeguarded in practice, and what would count as a violation. This trio centers the right on a concrete motivational justification (the interest), specifies the means to shield it (protection), and sets clear boundaries for when the right has been violated. It keeps analysis focused on why the right matters, how it is enforced, and what actions would breach it, rather than just describing where it comes from or what remedies exist. In AI ethics terms, you’d identify the important interest at stake (such as privacy or autonomy), describe the appropriate protections (laws, governance, and technical safeguards), and define violations (like data misuse or coercive manipulation) to determine when the right is violated. Other formulations tend to emphasize origins, remedies, or comparisons, which can miss one of these essential components.